Hi Willem,
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:22:24PM +0200, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:37 PM Vadym Kochan <vadym.koc...@plvision.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Marvell Prestera 98DX326x integrates up to 24 ports of 1GbE with 8
> > ports of 10GbE uplinks or 2 ports of 40Gbps stacking for a largely
> > wireless SMB deployment.
> >
> > The current implementation supports only boards designed for the Marvell
> > Switchdev solution and requires special firmware.
> >
> > The core Prestera switching logic is implemented in prestera_main.c,
> > there is an intermediate hw layer between core logic and firmware. It is
> > implemented in prestera_hw.c, the purpose of it is to encapsulate hw
> > related logic, in future there is a plan to support more devices with
> > different HW related configurations.
> >
> > This patch contains only basic switch initialization and RX/TX support
> > over SDMA mechanism.
> >
> > Currently supported devices have DMA access range <= 32bit and require
> > ZONE_DMA to be enabled, for such cases SDMA driver checks if the skb
> > allocated in proper range supported by the Prestera device.
> >
> > Also meanwhile there is no TX interrupt support in current firmware
> > version so recycling work is scheduled on each xmit.
> >
> > Port's mac address is generated from the switch base mac which may be
> > provided via device-tree (static one or as nvme cell), or randomly
> > generated.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Andrii Savka <andrii.sa...@plvision.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Savka <andrii.sa...@plvision.eu>
> > Co-developed-by: Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.ma...@plvision.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.ma...@plvision.eu>
> > Co-developed-by: Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.bo...@plvision.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.bo...@plvision.eu>
> > Co-developed-by: Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.ps...@plvision.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.ps...@plvision.eu>
> > Co-developed-by: Taras Chornyi <taras.chor...@plvision.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Taras Chornyi <taras.chor...@plvision.eu>
> > Co-developed-by: Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.myt...@plvision.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.myt...@plvision.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Vadym Kochan <vadym.koc...@plvision.eu>
>
> > +int prestera_hw_port_cap_get(const struct prestera_port *port,
> > + struct prestera_port_caps *caps)
> > +{
> > + struct prestera_msg_port_attr_resp resp;
> > + struct prestera_msg_port_attr_req req = {
> > + .attr = PRESTERA_CMD_PORT_ATTR_CAPABILITY,
> > + .port = port->hw_id,
> > + .dev = port->dev_id
> > + };
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = prestera_cmd_ret(port->sw, PRESTERA_CMD_TYPE_PORT_ATTR_GET,
> > + &req.cmd, sizeof(req), &resp.ret,
> > sizeof(resp));
>
> Here and elsewhere, why use a pointer to the first field in the struct
> vs the struct itself?
>
> They are the same address, so it's fine, just a bit confusing as the
> size argument makes clear that the entire struct is to be copied.
>
Well, initially it was a macro to simplify passing the different kind of
request structure. But after review I changed it to a function. The
struct prestera_msg_cmd is a common for all of the fw requests which
have to include it at the beginning. Eventually __prestera_cmd_ret() is
called to pass request buffer to the fw and struct prestera_msg_cmd is
used to check the response from fw. I can use 'void *' and typecast it
to struct prestera_msg_cmd but I'd like to keep type safety.
> > +static int prestera_is_valid_mac_addr(struct prestera_port *port, u8 *addr)
> > +{
> > + if (!is_valid_ether_addr(addr))
> > + return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
> > +
> > + if (memcmp(port->sw->base_mac, addr, ETH_ALEN - 1))
>
> Why ETH_ALEN - 1?
>
This is the restriction of the port mac address, it must have base mac
address part at first 5 bytes.
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int prestera_port_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
> > +{
> > + struct prestera_port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct sockaddr *addr = p;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = prestera_is_valid_mac_addr(port, addr->sa_data);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + err = prestera_hw_port_mac_set(port, addr->sa_data);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + memcpy(dev->dev_addr, addr->sa_data, dev->addr_len);
>
> Is addr_len ever not ETH_ALEN for this device?
I will fix it to use ether_addr_copy.
>
> > +static int prestera_sdma_buf_init(struct prestera_sdma *sdma,
> > + struct prestera_sdma_buf *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dma_dev = sdma->sw->dev->dev;
> > + struct prestera_sdma_desc *desc;
> > + dma_addr_t dma;
> > +
> > + desc = dma_pool_alloc(sdma->desc_pool, GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL, &dma);
> > + if (!desc)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + if (dma + sizeof(struct prestera_sdma_desc) > sdma->dma_mask) {
>
> Can this happen? The DMA API should take care of dev->dma_mask constraints.
>
I will fix it, thanks.
> > + dma_pool_free(sdma->desc_pool, desc, dma);
> > + dev_err(dma_dev, "failed to alloc desc\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
>
> > +static int prestera_sdma_rx_skb_alloc(struct prestera_sdma *sdma,
> > + struct prestera_sdma_buf *buf)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = sdma->sw->dev->dev;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + dma_addr_t dma;
> > +
> > + skb = alloc_skb(PRESTERA_SDMA_BUFF_SIZE_MAX, GFP_DMA | GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (!skb)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + dma = dma_map_single(dev, skb->data, skb->len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> > + if (dma_mapping_error(dev, dma))
> > + goto err_dma_map;
> > + if (dma + skb->len > sdma->dma_mask)
> > + goto err_dma_range;
>
> Same here
OK.
Regards,
Vadym Kochan
