On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> Jeff, might be worth getting the sk_buff leak fix in ppp from 
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg27706.html in 2.6.21 too?
>> 
>> Don't know how important it is for stable. It was present in 2.6.18 too.
>
> Can you resend the patch to me, please?
>
> Easier for the system to apply than the URL...

Sure, attached below. I think, though, this patch is already in someone's 
tree. Andrew has applied it to -mm under the name

ppp-dont-leak-an-sk_buff-on-interface-destruction.patch

but then dropped with the reasoning "This patch was dropped because it was 
merged into mainline or a subsystem tree". So, maybe it is now in Samuel's 
IrDA tree. Samuel?So, maybe all you have to do is to pull it from his 
tree.

Thanks
Guennadi
---------------------------------
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
Pascalstr. 28
D-52076 Aachen
Germany

Don't leak an sk_buff on interface destruction.

Signed-off-by: G. Liakhovetski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- a/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c 2007-03-23 13:04:04.000000000 +0100
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp_generic.c 2007-03-23 13:05:29.000000000 +0100
@@ -2544,6 +2544,9 @@
        ppp->active_filter = NULL;
  #endif /* CONFIG_PPP_FILTER */

+       if (ppp->xmit_pending)
+               kfree_skb(ppp->xmit_pending);
+
        kfree(ppp);
  }

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to