On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:39:09AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> "enable" should be "disable" when the function name is
> vhost_disable_notify(), which does the disabling work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsh...@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Why net-next though? It's a bugfix, can go into net.
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 5857d4e..b45519c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2537,7 +2537,7 @@ void vhost_disable_notify(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct
> vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> if (!vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) {
> r = vhost_update_used_flags(vq);
> if (r)
> - vq_err(vq, "Failed to enable notification at %p: %d\n",
> + vq_err(vq, "Failed to disable notification at %p: %d\n",
> &vq->used->flags, r);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.8.1
