On 2020-08-25 13:29, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:25:16PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
On 2020-08-25 13:13, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 11:16:27AM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
[...]
        struct i40e_rx_buffer *rx_buffer;
        rx_buffer = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, rx_ring->next_to_clean);
+       *rx_buffer_pgcnt = i40e_rx_buffer_page_count(rx_buffer);

What i previously meant was:

#if (PAGE_SIZE < 8192)
        *rx_buffer_pgcnt = page_count(rx_buffer->page);
#endif

and see below


Right...

        prefetchw(rx_buffer->page);
        /* we are reusing so sync this buffer for CPU use */
@@ -2112,9 +2124,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *i40e_build_skb(struct i40e_ring 
*rx_ring,
    * either recycle the buffer or unmap it and free the associated resources.
    */
   static void i40e_put_rx_buffer(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring,
-                              struct i40e_rx_buffer *rx_buffer)
+                              struct i40e_rx_buffer *rx_buffer,
+                              int rx_buffer_pgcnt)
   {
-       if (i40e_can_reuse_rx_page(rx_buffer)) {
+       if (i40e_can_reuse_rx_page(rx_buffer, rx_buffer_pgcnt)) {
                /* hand second half of page back to the ring */
                i40e_reuse_rx_page(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
        } else {
@@ -2319,6 +2332,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, 
int budget)
        unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
        bool failure = false;
        struct xdp_buff xdp;
+       int rx_buffer_pgcnt;

you could move scope this variable only for the

while (likely(total_rx_packets < (unsigned int)budget))

loop and init this to 0. then you could drop the helper function you've
added. and BTW the page_count is not being used for big pages but i agree
that it's better to have it set to 0.


...but isn't it a bit nasty with an output parameter that relies on the that
the input was set to zero. I guess it's a matter of taste, but I find that
more error prone.

Let me know if you have strong feelings about this, and I'll respin (but I
rather not!).

Up to you. No strong feelings, i just think that i40e_rx_buffer_page_count
is not needed. But if you want to keep it, then i was usually asking
people to provide the doxygen descriptions for newly introduced
functions... :P

but scoping it still makes sense to me, static analysis tools would agree
with me I guess.


Fair enough! I'll spin a v2! Thanks for taking a look!


Björn




Björn


   #if (PAGE_SIZE < 8192)
        xdp.frame_sz = i40e_rx_frame_truesize(rx_ring, 0);
@@ -2370,7 +2384,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, 
int budget)
                        break;
                i40e_trace(clean_rx_irq, rx_ring, rx_desc, skb);
-               rx_buffer = i40e_get_rx_buffer(rx_ring, size);
+               rx_buffer = i40e_get_rx_buffer(rx_ring, size, &rx_buffer_pgcnt);
                /* retrieve a buffer from the ring */
                if (!skb) {
@@ -2413,7 +2427,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, 
int budget)
                        break;
                }
-               i40e_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
+               i40e_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer, rx_buffer_pgcnt);
                cleaned_count++;
                if (i40e_is_non_eop(rx_ring, rx_desc, skb))
--
2.25.1

Reply via email to