On Tue Aug 25 2020, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:11:15AM +0200, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
[snip]
>> +static struct hellcreek_schedule *hellcreek_taprio_to_schedule(
>> +    const struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload *taprio)
>
> Personal indentation preference:
>
> static struct hellcreek_schedule
> *hellcreek_taprio_to_schedule(const struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload *taprio)

Sure.

>
>> +{
>> +    struct hellcreek_schedule *schedule;
>> +    size_t i;
>> +
>> +    /* Allocate some memory first */
>> +    schedule = kzalloc(sizeof(*schedule), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!schedule)
>> +            return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +    schedule->entries = kcalloc(taprio->num_entries,
>> +                                sizeof(*schedule->entries),
>> +                                GFP_KERNEL);
>> +    if (!schedule->entries) {
>> +            kfree(schedule);
>> +            return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* Construct hellcreek schedule */
>> +    schedule->num_entries = taprio->num_entries;
>> +    schedule->base_time   = taprio->base_time;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < taprio->num_entries; ++i) {
>> +            const struct tc_taprio_sched_entry *t = &taprio->entries[i];
>> +            struct hellcreek_gcl_entry *k = &schedule->entries[i];
>> +
>> +            k->interval       = t->interval;
>> +            k->gate_states    = t->gate_mask;
>> +            k->overrun_ignore = 0;
>
> Tab to align with gate_states and interval?

Hm. I've used M x align. It should take care of it.

> What does overrun_ignore do, anyway?

I don't remember. The HW engineer suggested to set it to zero.

>
>> +
>> +            /* Update complete cycle time */
>> +            schedule->cycle_time += t->interval;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return schedule;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum hrtimer_restart hellcreek_set_schedule(struct hrtimer *timer)
>> +{
>> +    struct hellcreek_port *hellcreek_port =
>> +            hrtimer_to_hellcreek_port(timer);
>
> That moment when not even the helper macro fits in 80 characters..
> I think you should let this line have 81 characters.

OK.

>
>> +    struct hellcreek *hellcreek = hellcreek_port->hellcreek;
>> +    struct hellcreek_schedule *schedule;
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&hellcreek->reg_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +    /* First select port */
>> +    hellcreek_select_tgd(hellcreek, hellcreek_port->port);
>> +
>> +    /* Set admin base time and switch schedule */
>> +    hellcreek_start_schedule(hellcreek,
>> +                             hellcreek_port->current_schedule->base_time);
>> +
>> +    schedule = hellcreek_port->current_schedule;
>> +    hellcreek_port->current_schedule = NULL;
>> +
>> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hellcreek->reg_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +    dev_dbg(hellcreek->dev, "ARMed EST timer for port %d\n",
>> +            hellcreek_port->port);
>> +
>> +    /* Free resources */
>> +    kfree(schedule->entries);
>> +    kfree(schedule);
>> +
>> +    return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int hellcreek_port_set_schedule(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> +                                   const struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload 
>> *taprio)
>> +{
>> +    struct net_device *netdev = dsa_to_port(ds, port)->slave;
>> +    struct hellcreek *hellcreek = ds->priv;
>> +    struct hellcreek_port *hellcreek_port;
>> +    struct hellcreek_schedule *schedule;
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> +    ktime_t start;
>> +    u16 ctrl;
>> +
>> +    hellcreek_port = &hellcreek->ports[port];
>> +
>> +    /* Convert taprio data to hellcreek schedule */
>> +    schedule = hellcreek_taprio_to_schedule(taprio);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(schedule))
>> +            return PTR_ERR(schedule);
>> +
>> +    dev_dbg(hellcreek->dev, "Configure traffic schedule on port %d\n",
>> +            port);
>> +
>> +    /* Cancel an in flight timer */
>> +    hrtimer_cancel(&hellcreek_port->cycle_start_timer);
>> +
>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&hellcreek->reg_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +    if (hellcreek_port->current_schedule) {
>> +            kfree(hellcreek_port->current_schedule->entries);
>> +            kfree(hellcreek_port->current_schedule);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    hellcreek_port->current_schedule = schedule;
>> +
>> +    /* First select port */
>> +    hellcreek_select_tgd(hellcreek, port);
>> +
>> +    /* Setup traffic class <-> queue mapping */
>> +    hellcreek_setup_tc_mapping(hellcreek, netdev);
>> +
>> +    /* Enable gating and set the admin state to forward everything in the
>> +     * mean time
>> +     */
>> +    ctrl = (0xff << TR_TGDCTRL_ADMINGATESTATES_SHIFT) | TR_TGDCTRL_GATE_EN;
>> +    hellcreek_write(hellcreek, ctrl, TR_TGDCTRL);
>> +
>> +    /* Cancel pending schedule */
>> +    hellcreek_write(hellcreek, 0x00, TR_ESTCMD);
>> +
>> +    /* Setup a new schedule */
>> +    hellcreek_setup_gcl(hellcreek, port, schedule);
>> +
>> +    /* Configure cycle time */
>> +    hellcreek_set_cycle_time(hellcreek, schedule);
>> +
>> +    /* Setup timer for schedule switch: The IP core only allows to set a
>> +     * cycle start timer 8 seconds in the future. This is why we setup the
>> +     * hritmer to base_time - 5 seconds. Then, we have enough time to
>> +     * activate IP core's EST timer.
>> +     */
>> +    start = ktime_sub_ns(schedule->base_time, (u64)5 * NSEC_PER_SEC);
>> +    hrtimer_start_range_ns(&hellcreek_port->cycle_start_timer, start,
>> +                           NSEC_PER_SEC, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
>
> Explain again how this works, please? The hrtimer measures the CLOCK_TAI
> of the CPU, but you are offloading the CLOCK_TAI domain of the NIC? So
> you are assuming that the CPU and the NIC PHC are synchronized? What if
> they aren't?

Yes, I assume that's synchronized with e.g. phc2sys.

>
> And what if the base-time is in the past, do you deal with that (how
> does the hardware deal with a base-time in the past)?
> A base-time in the past (example: 0) should work: you should advance the
> base-time into the nearest future multiple of the cycle-time, to at
> least preserve phase correctness of the schedule.

If the hrtimer is programmed with a value in the past, it fires
instantly. The callback is executed and the start time is
programmed.

>
> Just trying to understand if this whole hrtimer thing is worth it. It
> complicates the driver by quite a significant amount.

See my other reply mail, why I used hrtimers.

Thanks,
Kurt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to