On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 11:47:38AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 19:22 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 11:11:28AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:34 AM Russell King <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk> > > > wrote: > > > > Is this something you're willing to merge directly please? > > > > > > Done. > > > > > > That said: > > > > > > > -K: phylink > > > > +K: > > > > phylink\.h|struct\s+phylink|\.phylink|>phylink_|phylink_(autoneg|clear|connect|create|destroy|disconnect|ethtool|helper|mac|mii|of|set|start|stop|test|validate) > > > > > > That's a very awkward pattern. I wonder if there could be better ways > > > to express this (ie "only apply this pattern to these files" kind of > > > thing) > > > > Yes, it's extremely awkward - I spent much of the morning with perl > > testing it out on the drivers/ subtree. > > There are a lot of phylink_<foo> in the kernel. > Are those really the only uses you want to watch?
Hi Joe I think Rusells intention here is to match on MAC drivers which make use of the phylink API exported to them. SFF/SFP/SFP+ MODULE SUPPORT M: Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk> L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/net/phy/phylink.c F: drivers/net/phy/sfp* F: include/linux/phylink.h F: include/linux/sfp.h K: phylink > $ git grep -P -oh 'phylink_\w+'| sort | uniq -c Try that again, but skip files matched by the F: clauses. I suspect the matches you get then more closely approximates the K: Russell is suggesting. Andrew