On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:53 PM Martin Schiller <m...@dev.tdt.de> wrote: > > I don't like the idea to get rid of the 1-byte header. > This header is also used in userspace, for example when using a tun/tap > interface for an XoT (X.25 over TCP) application. A change would > therefore have very far-reaching consequences.
Thank you for your comment! This is very important information to me. Now I think it may be the best to keep the 1-byte header so that the kernel interface can be kept unchanged. > BTW: The linux x25 mailing list does not seem to work anymore. I've been > on it for some time now, but haven't received a single email from it. > I've tried to contact owner-linux-...@vger.kernel.org, but only got an > "undeliverable" email back. I was suspecting that it was not working, too. I CC'd all my patches to the mail list but got no response from it. It appears that you were not able to receive my emails through it, too. > It would be great if you could add me to CC list of all versions of your > patches, so I don't need to "google" for any further related mails. OK. I'll surely do that! Thank you for taking time to review my patches! > So, what's the latest version of the patch now, which you want me to > review? It is at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200802195046.402539-1-xie.he.0...@gmail.com/ Thank you so much for your review!
