On 7/30/2020 5:39 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > LGTM, > > minor suggestions: > - could you add opt-in support flags to struct devlink_ops, a'la > ethtool_ops->supported_coalesce_params so that you don't have to > modify all drivers to reject unsupported things? Sure that makes sense. > - could you split patch 2 into an ice change and a devlink core > change? > Yep.
- [net-next 0/4] devlink flash update overwrite mask Jacob Keller
- [net-next 1/4] devlink: convert flash_update to use pa... Jacob Keller
- [iproute2-next 4/4] devlink: support setting the overw... Jacob Keller
- [net-next 2/4] devlink: introduce flash update overwri... Jacob Keller
- [iproute2-next 3/4] Update devlink header for overwrit... Jacob Keller
- Re: [net-next 0/4] devlink flash update overwrite mask Jakub Kicinski
- Re: [net-next 0/4] devlink flash update overwrite ... Jacob Keller