On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 07:34:19PM +0530, Vikas Singh wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I understand your concern But my use case is pretty simple and
> straightforward.
> As you are already aware of the fact that operating systems running on
> standard
> server hardware requires standard firmware interfaces to be present in order
> to
> boot
> and function correctly.
> Here SBBR describes these firmware requirements which covers UEFI & ACPI.
> Therefore I would like to provide dual boot support to such systems which
> means
> supporting ACPI along with existing DT.
> Now kernels "__fixed_phy_registe() " being a wonderful implementation catters
> almost every thing required for both ACPI & DT
> But fails to register fixed PHYs in case of ACPI because it has no clue of the
> fwnode (of_node in case of DT) to attach with a PHY device.
You failed to answer my question. Why do you need a fixed PHY? Please
could you point me at your DT files so i can at least understand your
hardware.
Andrew
