Hi James, James Chapman schrieb: > Is there interest in adding L2TP support?
Yes, if there is also a user space part somewhere. > I have a patch which could be submitted for review. The PPPoL2TP driver > presents a PPPoX socket to userspace pppd in the same way as the PPPoE > and PPPoATM drivers. The kernel handles all data traffic, while > userspace daemons do L2TP and PPP control message processing. Like the pppoe-plugin for pppd? > In that thread, I was asked to improve the scalability of my solution by > avoiding the socket-per-session usage imposed by the PPPoX model. Since that is imposed by your generic upper layer (PPPoX) this is no valid argument against your code. (Yes, I've read that thread :-)) > Shall I post the patch? Yes, please check your patch using the nice checklist in Documentation/SubmitChecklist and do it in suitable chunks according to Documentation/SubmittingPatches I'm looking forward to review it! Best Regards Ingo Oeser - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
