On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:24 AM John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[...]

>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubrav...@fb.com>

> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c |   13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
> index 1f1966e..f8b13682 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ SEC("sockops")
>  int bpf_testcb(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
>  {
>         char header[sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + sizeof(struct tcphdr)];
> +       struct bpf_sock_ops *reuse = skops;
>         struct tcphdr *thdr;
>         int good_call_rv = 0;
>         int bad_call_rv = 0;
> @@ -62,6 +63,18 @@ int bpf_testcb(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
>         int v = 0;
>         int op;
>
> +       /* Test reading fields in bpf_sock_ops using single register */
> +       asm volatile (
> +               "%[reuse] = *(u32 *)(%[reuse] +96)"
> +               : [reuse] "+r"(reuse)
> +               :);
> +
> +       asm volatile (
> +               "%[op] = *(u32 *)(%[skops] +96)"
> +               : [op] "+r"(op)
> +               : [skops] "r"(skops)
> +               :);
> +

Shall we add a separate test for this? It does seem to fix in bpf_testcb().

>         op = (int) skops->op;
>
>         update_event_map(op);
>

Reply via email to