> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] Restructure drivers/net/phy > > > I think that the MAINTAINERS file should also be updated to mention > > the new path to the drivers. Just did a quick grep after 'drivers/net/phy': > > F: drivers/net/phy/adin.c > > F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-xgene.c > > F: drivers/net/phy/ > > F: drivers/net/phy/marvell10g.c > > F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-mvusb.c > > F: drivers/net/phy/dp83640* > > F: drivers/net/phy/phylink.c > > F: drivers/net/phy/sfp* > > F: drivers/net/phy/mdio-xpcs.c > > Hi Ioana > > Thanks, I will take care of that. > > > Other than that, the new 'drivers/net/phy/phy/' path is somewhat > > repetitive but unfortunately I do not have another better suggestion. > > Me neither. > > I wonder if we are looking at the wrong part of the patch. > drivers/net/X/phy/ > drivers/net/X/mdio/ > drivers/net/X/pcs/ > > Question is, what would X be? > > Andrew
It may not be a popular suggestion but can't we take the drivers/net/phy, drivers/net/pcs and drivers/net/mdio route? Ioana
