Introduce 6th test to taicalls kselftest that checks if tailcall can be
correctly executed from the BPF subprogram.

Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkow...@intel.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c      | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall6.c | 38 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall6.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index bb8fe646dd9f..192c94896809 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
 
 /* test_tailcall_1 checks basic functionality by patching multiple locations
  * in a single program for a single tail call slot with nop->jmp, jmp->nop
@@ -472,6 +473,88 @@ static void test_tailcall_5(void)
        bpf_object__close(obj);
 }
 
+/* test_tailcall_6 purpose is to make sure that tailcalls are working
+ * correctly in correlation with BPF subprograms
+ */
+static void test_tailcall_6(void)
+{
+       int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, i;
+       struct bpf_map *prog_array;
+       struct bpf_program *prog;
+       struct bpf_object *obj;
+       __u32 retval, duration;
+       char prog_name[32];
+
+       err = bpf_prog_load("tailcall6.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
+                           &prog_fd);
+       if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
+               return;
+
+       prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_title(obj, "classifier");
+       if (CHECK_FAIL(!prog))
+               goto out;
+
+       main_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
+       if (CHECK_FAIL(main_fd < 0))
+               goto out;
+
+       prog_array = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "jmp_table");
+       if (CHECK_FAIL(!prog_array))
+               goto out;
+
+       map_fd = bpf_map__fd(prog_array);
+       if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0))
+               goto out;
+
+       /* nop -> jmp */
+       for (i = 0; i < bpf_map__def(prog_array)->max_entries; i++) {
+               snprintf(prog_name, sizeof(prog_name), "classifier/%i", i);
+
+               prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_title(obj, prog_name);
+               if (CHECK_FAIL(!prog))
+                       goto out;
+
+               prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
+               if (CHECK_FAIL(prog_fd < 0))
+                       goto out;
+
+               err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &i, &prog_fd, BPF_ANY);
+               if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
+                       goto out;
+       }
+
+       err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
+                               0, &retval, &duration);
+       CHECK(err || retval != 1, "tailcall",
+             "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", err, errno, retval);
+
+       /* jmp -> nop, call subprog that will do tailcall */
+       i = 1;
+       err = bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, &i);
+       if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
+               goto out;
+
+       err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
+                               0, &retval, &duration);
+       CHECK(err || retval != 0, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+             err, errno, retval);
+
+       /* make sure that subprog can access ctx and entry prog that
+        * called this subprog can properly return
+        */
+       i = 0;
+       err = bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, &i);
+       if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
+               goto out;
+
+       err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
+                               0, &retval, &duration);
+       CHECK(err || retval != 108, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+             err, errno, retval);
+out:
+       bpf_object__close(obj);
+}
+
 void test_tailcalls(void)
 {
        if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_1"))
@@ -484,4 +567,6 @@ void test_tailcalls(void)
                test_tailcall_4();
        if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_5"))
                test_tailcall_5();
+       if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_6"))
+               test_tailcall_6();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall6.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall6.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e72ca5869b58
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+struct {
+       __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
+       __uint(max_entries, 2);
+       __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+       __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} jmp_table SEC(".maps");
+
+#define TAIL_FUNC(x)                           \
+       SEC("classifier/" #x)                   \
+       int bpf_func_##x(struct __sk_buff *skb) \
+       {                                       \
+               return x;                       \
+       }
+TAIL_FUNC(0)
+TAIL_FUNC(1)
+
+static __attribute__ ((noinline))
+int subprog_tail(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+       bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
+
+       return skb->len * 2;
+}
+
+SEC("classifier")
+int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+       bpf_tail_call(skb, &jmp_table, 1);
+
+       return subprog_tail(skb);
+}
+
+char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+int _version SEC("version") = 1;
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to