On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 04:09:57PM -0400, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> The LCPLL Reset sequence is added to the initialization path
> of the VSC8574 Family of phy drivers.
> 
> The LCPLL Reset sequence is known to reduce hardware inter-op
> issues when using the QSGMII MAC interface.
> 
> This patch is submitted to net-next to avoid merging conflicts that
> may arise if submitted to net.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Whitehead <bryan.whiteh...@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_main.c | 90 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_main.c 
> b/drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_main.c
> index a4fbf3a..f2fa221 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mscc/mscc_main.c
> @@ -929,6 +929,90 @@ static bool vsc8574_is_serdes_init(struct phy_device 
> *phydev)
>  }
>  
>  /* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
> +/* Page should already be set to MSCC_PHY_PAGE_EXTENDED_GPIO */
> +static int vsc8574_wait_for_micro_complete(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +     u16 timeout = 500;
> +     u16 reg18g = 0;
> +
> +     reg18g = phy_base_read(phydev, 18);
> +     while (reg18g & 0x8000) {
> +             timeout--;
> +             if (timeout == 0)
> +                     return -1;

Hi Bryan

-ETIMEDOUT;

But as Florian said, please add a phy_base_read_poll_timeout()
following what phy_read_poll_timeout() does.

> +             usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> +             reg18g = phy_base_read(phydev, 18);
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}


> +
> +/* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
> +static int vsc8574_reset_lcpll(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> +     u16 reg_val = 0;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     phy_base_write(phydev, MSCC_EXT_PAGE_ACCESS,
> +                    MSCC_PHY_PAGE_EXTENDED_GPIO);
> +
> +     /* Read LCPLL config vector into PRAM */
> +     phy_base_write(phydev, 18, 0x8023);
> +     ret = vsc8574_wait_for_micro_complete(phydev);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto done;
...
> +
> +done:
> +     phy_base_write(phydev, MSCC_EXT_PAGE_ACCESS, MSCC_PHY_PAGE_STANDARD);
> +     return ret;
> +}

So if vsc8574_wait_for_micro_complete() was to return -1, you pass it
on.

> +
> +/* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
>  static int vsc8574_config_pre_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  {
>       static const struct reg_val pre_init1[] = {
> @@ -1002,6 +1086,12 @@ static int vsc8574_config_pre_init(struct phy_device 
> *phydev)
>       bool serdes_init;
>       int ret;
>  
> +     ret = vsc8574_reset_lcpll(phydev);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "failed lcpll reset\n");
> +             return ret;
> +     }

And pass it on further. It could reach user space as an errno. It is
just safer to always use an errno value.

     Andrew

Reply via email to