On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 05:11:22PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:28:16AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > index c67c88ad35f8..9d4dbef3c943 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ enum bpf_arg_type {
> > > ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM, /* pointer to dynamically allocated
> > > memory */
> > > ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL, /* pointer to dynamically
> > > allocated memory or NULL */
> > > ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO, /* number of allocated bytes
> > > requested */
> > > + ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL, /* const argument used as pointer to
> > > bpf_map or NULL */
> > > };
> > In combination with the set, this also needs test_verifier selftests in
> > order to
> > exercise BPF insn snippets for the good & [expected] bad case.
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I just come up with a question, how should I test it without no bpf
> helper using it? Should I wait until the XDP multicast patch set merged?
ping?
