Hello.
Deepak Saxena wrote:
NETPOLL support for Sibyte MAC
Index: linux-2.6.18/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18.orig/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c
+++ linux-2.6.18/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c
@@ -1128,6 +1128,26 @@ static void sbdma_fillring(sbmacdma_t *d
}
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
+static void sbmac_netpoll(struct net_device *netdev)
+{
+ struct sbmac_softc *sc = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ int irq = sc->sbm_dev->irq;
+
+ __raw_writeq(0, sc->sbm_imr);
+
Thinking about it again, I'm not sure that blindly writing to the chip
reg. to mask interrupts is SMP-safe enough (versus disable_irq()). I know why
it was done this way -- to quell the BUG emitted in the realtime mode on SMP
-- because of scheduling with disabled interrupts in synchoronize_irq(), but
after having spent much time on netpoll, I'm no longer sure that anything but
disable_irq() is safe enough for SMP since -- otherwise there's no warranty
that sbmac_intr() is not running on another CPU...
+ sbmac_intr(irq, netdev, NULL);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SBMAC_COALESCE
+ __raw_writeq(((M_MAC_INT_EOP_COUNT | M_MAC_INT_EOP_TIMER) <<
S_MAC_TX_CH0) |
+ ((M_MAC_INT_EOP_COUNT | M_MAC_INT_EOP_TIMER) << S_MAC_RX_CH0),
+ sc->sbm_imr);
+#else
+ __raw_writeq((M_MAC_INT_CHANNEL << S_MAC_TX_CH0) |
+ (M_MAC_INT_CHANNEL << S_MAC_RX_CH0), sc->sbm_imr);
+#endif
+}
+#endif
WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
