> IMHO the problem with classifying RxRPC as a "reliable datagram" > socket is that even an atomic unidirectional communication isn't a > single datagram, it's at least 3; there is shared connection state
Thats fine. Any *reliable* protocol sends more than one packet per message you send. RDM is for reliable messages > independent and possibly simultaneous RxRPC calls. From the digging > around that I did in the kernel socket code a while ago I don't see a > cleaner way of implementing it than a new SOCK_RXRPC. I disagree entirely. I've still seen no evidence you need a new type for this. What does AIX do out of interest ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
