On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:41:49 +0530 sundeep subbaraya wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:41 AM Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:08:09 +0530 Subbaraya Sundeep wrote:  
> > > @@ -1730,10 +1745,149 @@ static void otx2_reset_task(struct work_struct 
> > > *work)
> > >       if (!netif_running(pf->netdev))
> > >               return;
> > >
> > > +     rtnl_lock();
> > >       otx2_stop(pf->netdev);
> > >       pf->reset_count++;
> > >       otx2_open(pf->netdev);
> > >       netif_trans_update(pf->netdev);
> > > +     rtnl_unlock();
> > > +}
> >
> > This looks unrelated, otherwise for the patches:  
>
> You mean the lock/unlock logic with this patch?

Looks very much like a bug independent of the PTP support.

Also 
$ git grep reset_task drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/
Doesn't reveal any place where you would flush or cancel that work.

> I can separate this out and put in another patch #4 if you insist.

Does someone need to insist for you to fix your bugs in the current
release cycle? That's a basic part of the kernel release process :/

Reply via email to