Hi,

> Attached below is my take on how to address this problem.  
> This addresses any concerns you may have had about checking 
> po->pppoe_dev==NULL,
> because accesses to this field are now synchronized with pppoe_hash_lock.

That indeed looks like a much cleaner solution, so I'd certainly prefer
it over mine. Testing so far didn't turn up any problems, either.

> Once we can settle on a fix for this, I'll deal with the SID==0 issue 
> (trying to do that now would just cause patch conflicts).

Well, yeah, this stuff probably is more important than support
for SID 0 :-)

Florian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to