On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:31:33 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
> No TX or RX path, no MCDI, not even an ifup/down handler.
> Besides stubs, the bulk of the patch deals with reading the Xilinx
> extended PCIe capability, which tells us where to find our BAR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ec...@solarflare.com>
Warnings:
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c:31:6: warning: symbol
'efx_separate_tx_channels' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c:45:13: warning: symbol
'ef100_hard_start_xmit' was not declared. Should it be static?
28a27,41
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c:15:6: warning: symbol '__efx_rx_packet' was
not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_tx.c:16:5: warning: symbol 'efx_enqueue_skb_tso'
was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_netdev.c:45:13: warning: no previous prototype
for ‘ef100_hard_start_xmit’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
45 | netdev_tx_t ef100_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rx.c:15:6: warning: no previous prototype for
‘__efx_rx_packet’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
15 | void __efx_rx_packet(struct efx_channel *channel)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_tx.c:16:5: warning: no previous prototype for
‘efx_enqueue_skb_tso’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
16 | int efx_enqueue_skb_tso(struct efx_tx_queue *tx_queue, struct sk_buff
*skb,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
