When testing a recent kernel (5.6 in our case), the skb->mark of the
IPv4 TCP RST pkt does not carry the mark from sk->sk_mark.  It is
discovered by the bpf@tc that depends on skb->mark to work properly.
The same bpf prog has been working in the earlier kernel version.
After reverting commit c6af0c227a22 ("ip: support SO_MARK cmsg"),
the skb->mark is set and seen by bpf@tc properly.

We have noticed that in IPv4 TCP RST but it should also
happen to the ACK based on tcp_v4_send_ack() is also depending
on ip_send_unicast_reply().

This patch tries to fix it by initializing the ipc.sockc.mark to
fl4.flowi4_mark.

Fixes: c6af0c227a22 ("ip: support SO_MARK cmsg")
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <will...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 090d3097ee15..033512f719ec 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -1703,6 +1703,7 @@ void ip_send_unicast_reply(struct sock *sk, struct 
sk_buff *skb,
        sk->sk_bound_dev_if = arg->bound_dev_if;
        sk->sk_sndbuf = sysctl_wmem_default;
        sk->sk_mark = fl4.flowi4_mark;
+       ipc.sockc.mark = fl4.flowi4_mark;
        err = ip_append_data(sk, &fl4, ip_reply_glue_bits, arg->iov->iov_base,
                             len, 0, &ipc, &rt, MSG_DONTWAIT);
        if (unlikely(err)) {
-- 
2.24.1

Reply via email to