David Miller a écrit :
Eric, please look at whole files you are editing :) I'm sure
there is probably another case like this or two in the
other platform socket ioctl allocations you made.
Thanks.
commit 9415518744729743b017da2e08a71c5bb0d94108
Author: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Mar 9 16:22:52 2007 -0800
[NET]: Fix SO_TIMESTAMPNS values allocated to sparc.
They confliced with SO_BROADCAST which already uses the
value 0x0020.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh I see :( this one was really not easy to spot without close inspection :)
I just checked all arches and only sparc{64} have this strange SO_XXXX values
not linear. I wonder why this layout was chosen ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
