On 6/19/20 4:04 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
bpf_object__find_program_by_title(), used by CO-RE relocation code, doesn't
return .text "BPF program", if it is a function storage for sub-programs.
Because of that, any CO-RE relocation in helper non-inlined functions will
fail. Fix this by searching for .text-corresponding BPF program manually.
Adjust one of bpf_iter selftest to exhibit this pattern.
Reported-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
Fixes: ddc7c3042614 ("libbpf: implement BPF CO-RE offset relocation algorithm")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andr...@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
But the fix here only fixed the issue for interpreter mode.
For jit only mode, we still have issues. The following patch can fix
the jit mode issue,
=============
From 4d66814513ec45b86a30a1231b8a000d4bfc6f1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 23:26:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: set the number of exception entries properly for
subprograms
Currently, if a bpf program has more than one subprograms, each
program will be jitted separately. For tracing problem, the
prog->aux->num_exentries is not setup properly. For example,
with bpf_iter_netlink.c modified to force one function not inlined,
and with proper libbpf fix, with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON,
we will have error like below:
$ ./test_progs -n 3/3
...
libbpf: failed to load program 'iter/netlink'
libbpf: failed to load object 'bpf_iter_netlink'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'bpf_iter_netlink': -4007
test_netlink:FAIL:bpf_iter_netlink__open_and_load skeleton
open_and_load failed
#3/3 netlink:FAIL
The dmesg shows the following errors:
ex gen bug
which is triggered by the following code in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:
if (excnt >= bpf_prog->aux->num_exentries) {
pr_err("ex gen bug\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
If the program has more than one subprograms, num_exentries is actually
0 since it is not setup.
This patch fixed the issue by setuping proper num_exentries for
each subprogram before calling jit function.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 34cde841ab68..7d8b23ba825c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9801,7 +9801,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
int i, j, subprog_start, subprog_end = 0, len, subprog;
struct bpf_insn *insn;
void *old_bpf_func;
- int err;
+ int err, num_exentries;
if (env->subprog_cnt <= 1)
return 0;
@@ -9876,6 +9876,16 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
func[i]->aux->nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
func[i]->aux->jited_linfo = prog->aux->jited_linfo;
func[i]->aux->linfo_idx = env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx;
+
+ num_exentries = 0;
+ insn = func[i]->insnsi;
+ for (j = 0; j < func[i]->len; j++, insn++) {
+ if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_LDX &&
+ BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM)
+ num_exentries++;
+ }
+ func[i]->aux->num_exentries = num_exentries;
+
func[i] = bpf_int_jit_compile(func[i]);
if (!func[i]->jited) {
err = -ENOTSUPP;
--
2.24.1
================
We need this (or similar fixes) go in together with libbpf fix
to avoid bpf_iter_netlink.c test failure at jit only mode.
Do we need a separate patch for the above fix? Or Andrii can
fold this into his patch and resubmit? Maybe the latter is better.
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 8 +++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_netlink.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 477c679ed945..f17151d866e6 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -4818,7 +4818,13 @@ bpf_core_reloc_fields(struct bpf_object *obj, const char
*targ_btf_path)
err = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_title(obj, sec_name);
+ prog = NULL;
+ for (i = 0; i < obj->nr_programs; i++) {
+ if (!strcmp(obj->programs[i].section_name, sec_name)) {
+ prog = &obj->programs[i];
+ break;
+ }
+ }
if (!prog) {
pr_warn("failed to find program '%s' for CO-RE offset
relocation\n",
sec_name);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_netlink.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_netlink.c
index e7b8753eac0b..75ecf956a2df 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_netlink.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_netlink.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct bpf_iter__netlink {
struct netlink_sock *sk;
} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
-static inline struct inode *SOCK_INODE(struct socket *socket)
+static __attribute__((noinline)) struct inode *SOCK_INODE(struct socket
*socket)
{
return &container_of(socket, struct socket_alloc, socket)->vfs_inode;
}
