From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <ja...@zx2c4.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 00:29:45 -0600
> This is a series of 1, and the sole patch inside of it has justification > regarding that patch itself. But I thought I'd mention in the cover > letter that this is being sent right at the tail end of the net-next > cycle, before you close it tomorrow afternoon, so that when net-next > subsequently opens up, this patch has already made it to net, and we > don't have any hassles with merges. I realize that in general this isn't > the type of patch anyone really likes because of the merge hassle, but I > think the timing is right for it, and WireGuard is still young enough > that this should be still pretty easily possible. This is going to make nearly every -stable backport not apply cleanly, which is a severe burdon for everyone having to maintain stable trees. I'm not applying this, sorry Jason.
