On 5/19/20 7:28 PM, Anchal Agarwal wrote:
> From: Munehisa Kamata <kama...@amazon.com>
>
> Save steal clock values of all present CPUs in the system core ops
> suspend callbacks. Also, restore a boot CPU's steal clock in the system
> core resume callback. For non-boot CPUs, restore after they're brought
> up, because runstate info for non-boot CPUs are not active until then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Munehisa Kamata <kama...@amazon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anchal Agarwal <ancha...@amazon.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/suspend.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/xen/time.c    |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/suspend.c b/arch/x86/xen/suspend.c
> index 784c4484100b..dae0f74f5390 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/suspend.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/suspend.c
> @@ -91,12 +91,20 @@ void xen_arch_suspend(void)
>  static int xen_syscore_suspend(void)
>  {
>       struct xen_remove_from_physmap xrfp;
> -     int ret;
> +     int cpu, ret;
>  
>       /* Xen suspend does similar stuffs in its own logic */
>       if (xen_suspend_mode_is_xen_suspend())
>               return 0;
>  
> +     for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> +             /*
> +              * Nonboot CPUs are already offline, but the last copy of
> +              * runstate info is still accessible.
> +              */
> +             xen_save_steal_clock(cpu);
> +     }
> +
>       xrfp.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>       xrfp.gpfn = __pa(HYPERVISOR_shared_info) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> @@ -118,6 +126,9 @@ static void xen_syscore_resume(void)
>  
>       pvclock_resume();


Doesn't make any difference but I think since this patch is where you
are dealing with clock then pvclock_resume() should be added here and
not in the earlier patch.


-boris


>  
> +     /* Nonboot CPUs will be resumed when they're brought up */
> +     xen_restore_steal_clock(smp_processor_id());
> +
>       gnttab_resume();
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> index c8897aad13cd..33d754564b09 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,9 @@ static void xen_hvm_setup_cpu_clockevents(void)
>  {
>       int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>       xen_setup_runstate_info(cpu);
> +     if (cpu)
> +             xen_restore_steal_clock(cpu);
> +
>       /*
>        * xen_setup_timer(cpu) - snprintf is bad in atomic context. Hence
>        * doing it xen_hvm_cpu_notify (which gets called by smp_init during



Reply via email to