From: Maor Dickman <ma...@mellanox.com>
On tunnel decap rule insertion, the indirect mechanism will attempt to
offload the rule on all uplink representors which will trigger the
"devices are not on same switch HW, can't offload forwarding" message
for the uplink which isn't on the same switch HW as the VF representor.
The above flow is valid and shouldn't cause warning message,
fix by removing the warning and only report this flow using extack.
Fixes: f3953003a66f ("net/mlx5e: Fix allowed tc redirect merged eswitch offload
cases")
Signed-off-by: Maor Dickman <ma...@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <r...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index cac36c27c7fa4..6e7b2ce29d411 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -3849,10 +3849,6 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
if (!mlx5e_is_valid_eswitch_fwd_dev(priv,
out_dev)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
"devices are not on
same switch HW, can't offload forwarding");
- netdev_warn(priv->netdev,
- "devices %s %s not on same
switch HW, can't offload forwarding\n",
- priv->netdev->name,
- out_dev->name);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
2.26.2
