> Add a mutex destroy call in hclge_init_ae_dev() when fails. How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Change description: The function “mutex_init” was called before a call of the function “hclge_pci_init”. But the function “mutex_destroy” was not called after initialisation steps failed. Thus add the missed function call for the completion of the exception handling. Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message? … > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c > @@ -10108,6 +10108,7 @@ static int hclge_init_ae_dev(struct hnae3_ae_dev > *ae_dev) > pci_release_regions(pdev); > pci_disable_device(pdev); > out: > + mutex_destroy(&hdev->vport_lock); > return ret; > } How do you think about to use the label “destroy_mutex” instead? Regards, Markus
