On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:57:55PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Greg, Jason,
>
> On 5/20/2020 12:32 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Dave Ertman <david.m.ert...@intel.com>
> >
>
> > +static const
> > +struct virtbus_dev_id *virtbus_match_id(const struct virtbus_dev_id *id,
> > + struct virtbus_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > + while (id->name[0]) {
> > + if (!strcmp(vdev->match_name, id->name))
> > + return id;
>
> Should we have VID, DID based approach instead of _any_ string chosen by
> vendor drivers?
No, because:
> This will required central place to define the VID, DID of the vdev in
> vdev_ids.h to have unique ids.
That's not a good way to run things :)
Have the virtbus core create the "name", as it really doesn't matter
what it is, just that it is unique, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
