On Tue 19 May 2020 at 21:58, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 2:04 AM Vlad Buslov <vla...@mellanox.com> wrote:
>> I considered that approach initially but decided against it for
>> following reasons:
>>
>> - Generic data is covered by current terse dump implementation.
>> Everything else will be act or cls specific which would result long
>> list of flag values like: TCA_DUMP_FLOWER_KEY_ETH_DST,
>> TCA_DUMP_FLOWER_KEY_ETH_DST, TCA_DUMP_FLOWER_KEY_VLAN_ID, ...,
>> TCA_DUMP_TUNNEL_KEY_ENC_KEY_ID, TCA_DUMP_TUNNEL_KEY_ENC_TOS. All of
>> these would require a lot of dedicated logic in act and cls dump
>> callbacks. Also, it would be quite a challenge to test all possible
>> combinations.
>
> Well, if you consider netlink dump as a database query, what Edward
> proposed is merely "select COLUMN1 COLUMN2 from cls_db" rather
> than "select * from cls_db".
>
> No one said it is easy to implement, it is just more elegant than you
> select a hardcoded set of columns for the user.
As I explained to Edward, having denser netlink packets with more
filters per packet is only part of optimization. Another part is not
executing some code at all. Consider fl_dump_key() which is 200 lines
function with bunch of conditionals like that:
static int fl_dump_key(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
struct fl_flow_key *key, struct fl_flow_key *mask)
{
if (mask->meta.ingress_ifindex) {
struct net_device *dev;
dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, key->meta.ingress_ifindex);
if (dev && nla_put_string(skb, TCA_FLOWER_INDEV, dev->name))
goto nla_put_failure;
}
if (fl_dump_key_val(skb, key->eth.dst, TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ETH_DST,
mask->eth.dst, TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ETH_DST_MASK,
sizeof(key->eth.dst)) ||
fl_dump_key_val(skb, key->eth.src, TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ETH_SRC,
mask->eth.src, TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ETH_SRC_MASK,
sizeof(key->eth.src)) ||
fl_dump_key_val(skb, &key->basic.n_proto, TCA_FLOWER_KEY_ETH_TYPE,
&mask->basic.n_proto, TCA_FLOWER_UNSPEC,
sizeof(key->basic.n_proto)))
goto nla_put_failure;
if (fl_dump_key_mpls(skb, &key->mpls, &mask->mpls))
goto nla_put_failure;
if (fl_dump_key_vlan(skb, TCA_FLOWER_KEY_VLAN_ID,
TCA_FLOWER_KEY_VLAN_PRIO, &key->vlan, &mask->vlan))
goto nla_put_failure;
...
Now imagine all of these are extended with additional if (flags &
TCA_DUMP_XXX). All gains from not outputting some other minor stuff into
netlink packet will be negated by it.
>
> Think about it, what if another user wants a less terse dump but still
> not a full dump? Would you implement ops->terse_dump2()? Or
> what if people still think your terse dump is not as terse as she wants?
> ops->mini_dump()? How many ops's we would end having?
User can discard whatever he doesn't need in user land code. The goal of
this change is performance optimization, not designing a generic
kernel-space data filtering mechanism.
>
>
>>
>> - It is hard to come up with proper validation for such implementation.
>> In case of terse dump I just return an error if classifier doesn't
>> implement the callback (and since current implementation only outputs
>> generic action info, it doesn't even require support from
>> action-specific dump callbacks). But, for example, how do we validate
>> a case where user sets some flower and tunnel_key act dump flags from
>> previous paragraph, but Qdisc contains some other classifier? Or
>> flower classifier points to other types of actions? Or when flower
>> classifier has and tunnel_key actions but also mirred? Should the
>
> Each action should be able to dump selectively too. If you think it
> as a database, it is just a different table with different schemas.
How is designing custom SQL-like query language (according to your
example at the beginning of the mail) for filter dump is going to
improve performance? If there is a way to do it in fast a generic manner
with BPF, then I'm very interested to hear the details. But adding
hundred more hardcoded conditionals is just not a solution considering
main motivations for this change is performance.
