Apparently no, did you send the wrong patch? But since you'll have to resend again, 2 more minor stylistic comments.
> +P_2 being succesful in reaching its destination and advancing the connection successful > +state normally. It is conceivable that the late-arriving P may be considered > to > +be not associated with any connection tracking entry. Generating a reject s/be not/not be/ is probably better > +only DROP these. would 'those' be better? > +P_2 being succesful in reaching its destination and advancing the connection ditto
