On Sat, 9 May 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > While at it, rename a label in order to be slightly more informative and
> > split some too long lines.
>
> Would you like to add the tag 'Fixes' to the change description?
>
Sorry but I don't follow your reasoning here. Are you saying that this
needs to be pushed out to -stable branches? If so, stable-kernel-rules.rst
would seem to disagree as the bug is theoretical and isn't bothering
people.
Is there a way to add a Fixes tag that would not invoke the -stable
process? And was that what you had in mind?
>
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/macsonic.c
> > @@ -506,10 +506,14 @@ static int mac_sonic_platform_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > err = register_netdev(dev);
> > if (err)
> > - goto out;
> > + goto undo_probe1;
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > +undo_probe1:
> > + dma_free_coherent(lp->device,
> > + SIZEOF_SONIC_DESC * SONIC_BUS_SCALE(lp->dma_bitmode),
> > + lp->descriptors, lp->descriptors_laddr);
> > out:
> How do you think about the possibility to use the label 'free_dma'?
I think 'undo_probe1' is both descriptive and consistent with commit
10e3cc180e64 ("net/sonic: Fix a resource leak in an error handling path in
'jazz_sonic_probe()'").
Your suggestion, 'free_dma' is also good. But coming up with good
alternatives is easy. If every good alternative would be considered there
would be no obvious way to get a patch merged.
