On Thu, 7 May 2020 18:22:27 +0000 Luo bin wrote:
> if some function in ndo_stop interface returns failure because of
> hardware fault, must go on excuting rest steps rather than return
> failure directly, otherwise will cause memory leak
>
> Signed-off-by: Luo bin <luob...@huawei.com>
The code looks good, but would it make sense to split this patch into
two? First one that ignores the return values on close path with these
fixes tags:
Fixes: e2585ea77538 ("net-next/hinic: Add Rx handler")
Fixes: c4d06d2d208a ("net-next/hinic: Add Rx mode and link event handler")
And a separate patch which bumps the timeout for SET_FUNC_STATE? Right
now you don't even mention the timeout changes in the commit message.
