Hi David
I noticed in oprofile study a cache miss in tcp_rcv_established() to read
copied_seq.
ffffffff80400a80 <tcp_rcv_established>: /* tcp_rcv_established total: 4034293
2.0400 */
55493 0.0281 :ffffffff80400bc9: mov 0x4c8(%r12),%eax copied_seq
543103 0.2746 :ffffffff80400bd1: cmp 0x3e0(%r12),%eax rcv_nxt
if (tp->copied_seq == tp->rcv_nxt &&
len - tcp_header_len <= tp->ucopy.len) {
In this function, the cache line 0x4c0 -> 0x500 is used only for this
reading 'copied_seq' field.
rcv_wup and copied_seq should be next to rcv_nxt field, to lower number of
active cache lines in hot paths. (tcp_rcv_established(), tcp_poll(), ...)
Patch is 64bit friendly (no new hole because of alignment constraints)
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux/include/linux/tcp.h 2007-02-22 11:53:22.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-ed/include/linux/tcp.h 2007-02-22 12:03:19.000000000 +0100
@@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ struct tcp_sock {
* See RFC793 and RFC1122. The RFC writes these in capitals.
*/
u32 rcv_nxt; /* What we want to receive next */
+ u32 copied_seq; /* Head of yet unread data */
+ u32 rcv_wup; /* rcv_nxt on last window update sent */
u32 snd_nxt; /* Next sequence we send */
u32 snd_una; /* First byte we want an ack for */
@@ -307,10 +309,8 @@ struct tcp_sock {
struct sk_buff_head out_of_order_queue; /* Out of order segments go
here */
u32 rcv_wnd; /* Current receiver window */
- u32 rcv_wup; /* rcv_nxt on last window update sent */
u32 write_seq; /* Tail(+1) of data held in tcp send buffer */
u32 pushed_seq; /* Last pushed seq, required to talk to windows
*/
- u32 copied_seq; /* Head of yet unread data */
/* SACKs data */
struct tcp_sack_block duplicate_sack[1]; /* D-SACK block */
