On Tue, 5 May 2020 09:45:11 +0200 Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:28:40AM +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > From: SeongJae Park <sjp...@amazon.de>
> > 
> > This reverts commit 333f7909a8573145811c4ab7d8c9092301707721.
> > 
> > The commit 6d7855c54e1e ("sockfs: switch to ->free_inode()") made the
> > deallocation of 'socket_alloc' to be done asynchronously using RCU, as
> > same to 'sock.wq'.  And the following commit 333f7909a857 ("coallocate
> > socket_sq with socket itself") made those to have same life cycle.
> > 
> > The changes made the code much more simple, but also made 'socket_alloc'
> > live longer than before.  For the reason, user programs intensively
> > repeating allocations and deallocations of sockets could cause memory
> > pressure on recent kernels.
> > 
> > To avoid the problem, this commit separates the life cycle of
> > 'socket_alloc' and 'sock.wq' again.  The following commit will make the
> > deallocation of 'socket_alloc' to be done synchronously again.
> > ---
> 
> No signed-off-by?
> No "Fixes:"?

Oops, my mistake.  I will post next version right now.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park

> 
> :(

Reply via email to