> … However, the code fragment is incorrect > because the dev pointer is used before the actual check
I find such information interesting. > which leads to undefined behavior. … I suggest to adjust the wording for this “conclusion”. Regards, Markus
> … However, the code fragment is incorrect > because the dev pointer is used before the actual check
I find such information interesting. > which leads to undefined behavior. … I suggest to adjust the wording for this “conclusion”. Regards, Markus