On 5/1/2020 2:32 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 1 May 2020 21:23:25 +0000 Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>>> Could you please send the snapshot id just before you return 0 in this
>>> function, as you offered in v1? I think it would be great to do it like
>>> that.
>>>
>>
>> Also: Does it make sense to send the snapshot id regardless of
>> whether it was auto-generated or not?
>
> I may be wrong, but I think sending extra messages via netlink,
> which user space may not expect based on previous kernel versions
> is considered uAPI breakage.
>
Ok makes sense.
Thanks,
Jake
