On 4/29/20 6:45 PM, William Tu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 2:52 PM David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 4/26/20 9:04 AM, William Tu wrote: >>> The Type I ERSPAN frame format is based on the barebones >>> IP + GRE(4-byte) encapsulation on top of the raw mirrored frame. >>> Both type I and II use 0x88BE as protocol type. Unlike type II >>> and III, no sequence number or key is required. >> >> should this be considered a bug fix or -next is what you prefer? >> > Hi David, > Since it's supporting a new type, I'd consider -next. > But either way is ok to me, I don't have have any preference. > Thanks! > William >
applied to iproute2-next.
