Hi Andrew, Thanks for the reply. It's the mainline tree, was 5.6.-rc7 at the time. There's no tree mentioned for the ethernet PHY library in the maintainers files, but am I expected to test against net/ or net-next/ ? I'm happy to do so but should I use rather use net/ since this is more of a bugfix?
Best regards, Laurent > ----------------------------- Eaton Industries Manufacturing GmbH ~ Registered place of business: Route de la Longeraie 7, 1110, Morges, Switzerland ----------------------------- -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 5:25 PM > To: Badel, Laurent <laurentba...@eaton.com> > Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; fugang.d...@nxp.com; > netdev@vger.kernel.org; f.faine...@gmail.com; hkallwe...@gmail.com; > li...@armlinux.org.uk; richard.leit...@skidata.com; > da...@davemloft.net; alexander.le...@microsoft.com; Quette, Arnaud > <arnaudque...@eaton.com> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert commit > 1b0a83ac04e383e3bed21332962b90710fcf2828 > > > Test results: using an iMX28-EVK-based board, this patch successfully > > restores network interface functionality when interrupts are enabled. > > Tested using both linux-5.4.23 and latest mainline (5.6.0) kernels. > > Hi Laurent > > What tree are these patches against? > > That is why i pointed you to the netdev FAQ. > > Also, for a multi-part series, you should add a cover latter. > > Andrew
