Hi Lorenzo, On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:45:38PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > Increment netdev rx counters even for XDP_DROP verdict. Moreover report > even tx bytes for xdp buffers (TYPE_NETSEC_XDP_TX or > TYPE_NETSEC_XDP_NDO)
The RX counters work fine. The TX change is causing a panic though and i am looking into it since your patch seems harmless. In any case please don't merge this yet Thanks /Ilias > Fixes: ba2b232108d3 ("net: netsec: add XDP support") > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lore...@kernel.org> > --- > just compiled not tested on a real device > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c > index f9e6744d8fd6..b1c2a79899b3 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c > @@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ > #define NETSEC_XDP_CONSUMED BIT(0) > #define NETSEC_XDP_TX BIT(1) > #define NETSEC_XDP_REDIR BIT(2) > -#define NETSEC_XDP_RX_OK (NETSEC_XDP_PASS | NETSEC_XDP_TX | NETSEC_XDP_REDIR) > > enum ring_id { > NETSEC_RING_TX = 0, > @@ -661,6 +660,7 @@ static bool netsec_clean_tx_dring(struct netsec_priv > *priv) > bytes += desc->skb->len; > dev_kfree_skb(desc->skb); > } else { > + bytes += desc->xdpf->len; > xdp_return_frame(desc->xdpf); > } > next: > @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ static int netsec_process_rx(struct netsec_priv *priv, > int budget) > > next: > if ((skb && napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi, skb) != GRO_DROP) || > - xdp_result & NETSEC_XDP_RX_OK) { > + xdp_result) { > ndev->stats.rx_packets++; > ndev->stats.rx_bytes += xdp.data_end - xdp.data; > } > -- > 2.21.0 >