Hi Lorenzo, 

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 01:18:33AM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Refactor mvneta_rx_swbm code introducing mvneta_swbm_rx_frame and
> mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment routines. Rely on build_skb in oreder to
> allocate skb since the previous patch introduced buffer recycling using
> the page_pool API.
> This patch fixes even an issue in the original driver where dma buffers
> are accessed before dma sync
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <bro...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lore...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 198 ++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index 31cecc1ed848..79a6bac0192b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -323,6 +323,11 @@
>             ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN,                        \
>             cache_line_size())
>  
> +#define MVNETA_SKB_PAD       (SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info) 
> + \
> +                      NET_SKB_PAD))
> +#define MVNETA_SKB_SIZE(len) (SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len) + MVNETA_SKB_PAD)
> +#define MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE       (PAGE_SIZE - MVNETA_SKB_PAD)
> +
>  #define IS_TSO_HEADER(txq, addr) \
>       ((addr >= txq->tso_hdrs_phys) && \
>        (addr < txq->tso_hdrs_phys + txq->size * TSO_HEADER_SIZE))
> @@ -646,7 +651,6 @@ static int txq_number = 8;
>  static int rxq_def;
>  
>  static int rx_copybreak __read_mostly = 256;
> -static int rx_header_size __read_mostly = 128;
>  
>  /* HW BM need that each port be identify by a unique ID */
>  static int global_port_id;
> +     if (rxq->left_size > MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE) {

[...]

> +             len = MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE;
> +             data_len = len;
> +     } else {
> +             len = rxq->left_size;
> +             data_len = len - ETH_FCS_LEN;
> +     }
> +     dma_dir = page_pool_get_dma_dir(rxq->page_pool);
> +     dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu(dev->dev.parent,
> +                                   rx_desc->buf_phys_addr, 0,
> +                                   len, dma_dir);
> +     if (data_len > 0) {
> +             /* refill descriptor with new buffer later */
> +             skb_add_rx_frag(rxq->skb,
> +                             skb_shinfo(rxq->skb)->nr_frags,
> +                             page, NET_SKB_PAD, data_len,
> +                             PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +             page_pool_release_page(rxq->page_pool, page);
> +             rx_desc->buf_phys_addr = 0;

Shouldn't we unmap and set the buf_phys_addr to 0 regardless of the data_len?

> +     }
> +     rxq->left_size -= len;
> +}
> +
>               mvneta_rxq_buf_size_set(pp, rxq, PAGE_SIZE < SZ_64K ?

[...]

> -                                     PAGE_SIZE :
> +                                     MVNETA_MAX_RX_BUF_SIZE :
>                                       MVNETA_RX_BUF_SIZE(pp->pkt_size));
>               mvneta_rxq_bm_disable(pp, rxq);
>               mvneta_rxq_fill(pp, rxq, rxq->size);
> @@ -4656,7 +4666,7 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &pdev->dev);
>  
>       pp->id = global_port_id++;
> -     pp->rx_offset_correction = 0; /* not relevant for SW BM */
> +     pp->rx_offset_correction = NET_SKB_PAD;
>  
>       /* Obtain access to BM resources if enabled and already initialized */
>       bm_node = of_parse_phandle(dn, "buffer-manager", 0);
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 

Regards
/Ilias

Reply via email to