On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:01:44PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 07:52:30PM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
> >Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 10:40:56AM CEST, ido...@idosch.org wrote:
> >>From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
> >>
> >>With the new notifications mlxsw does not need to handle identical
> >>routes itself, as this is taken care of by the core IPv4 code.
> >>
> >>Instead, mlxsw only needs to take care of inserting and removing routes
> >>from the device.
> >>
> >>Convert mlxsw to use the new IPv4 route notifications and simplify the
> >>code.
> >>
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >
> >>@@ -6246,9 +6147,10 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(struct
> >>notifier_block *nb,
> >> err = mlxsw_sp_router_fib_rule_event(event, info,
> >> router->mlxsw_sp);
> >> return notifier_from_errno(err);
> >>- case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:
> >>+ case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD: /* fall through */
> >> case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE: /* fall through */
> >> case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_APPEND: /* fall through */
> >
> >Why don't you skip the three above with just return of NOTIFY_DONE?
>
> if (info->family == AF_INET)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
It's not really needed given ADD and APPEND are not sent for AF_INET
after this patchset. But I did find out that I forgot to remove them
from mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_event(), so I'll do that in v1.
Thanks!
>
> >
> >
> >>+ case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE_TMP:
> >> if (router->aborted) {
> >> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(info->extack, "FIB offload was
> >> aborted. Not configuring route");
> >> return notifier_from_errno(-EINVAL);
> >>--
> >>2.21.0
> >>
