On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:25:33 +0000, Song Liu wrote: > > On Sep 30, 2019, at 4:18 PM, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:58:35 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 3:55 PM Song Liu <liu.song....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 1:43 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andr...@fb.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Make bpf_helpers.h and bpf_endian.h official part of libbpf. Ensure they > >>>> are installed along the other libbpf headers. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andr...@fb.com> > >>> > >>> Can we merge/rearrange 2/6 and 3/6, so they is a git-rename instead of > >>> many +++ and ---? > >> > >> I arranged them that way because of Github sync. We don't sync > >> selftests/bpf changes to Github, and it causes more churn if commits > >> have a mix of libbpf and selftests changes. > >> > >> I didn't modify bpf_helpers.h/bpf_endian.h between those patches, so > >> don't worry about reviewing contents ;) > > > > I thought we were over this :/ Please merge the patches. > > Andrii changed syntax for BPF_CORE_READ(). I guess that is new?
I meant the battle to not split changes into harder to review, and less logical form based on what some random, never review upstream script can or cannot do :) I was responding to the "don't worry about reviewing contents" - as you pointed out git would just generate a move..
