Hello,

I see that the 'State' of the initially submitted patch has changed to
"Changes Requested" but I have not seen a follow-up email regarding
what needs to be changed. I also realized that the tabs had not been
preserved in my initial submission, hence the resubmission.

Thanks,
Pooja.



On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:14 PM Pooja Trivedi <poojatriv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pooja Trivedi <pooja.triv...@stackpath.com>
>
> Enclosing tls_tx_records within lock_sock/release_sock pair to ensure
> write-synchronization is not sufficient because socket lock gets released
> under memory pressure situation by sk_wait_event while it sleeps waiting
> for memory, allowing another writer into tls_tx_records. This causes a
> race condition with record deletion post transmission.
>
> To fix this bug, use a flag set in tx_bitmask field of TLS context to
> ensure single writer in tls_tx_records at a time
>
> The bug resulted in the following crash:
>
> [  270.888952] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  270.890450] list_del corruption, ffff91cc3753a800->prev is
> LIST_POISON2 (dead000000000122)
> [  270.891194] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7387 at lib/list_debug.c:50
> __list_del_entry_valid+0x62/0x90
> [  270.892037] Modules linked in: n5pf(OE) netconsole tls(OE) bonding
> intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common sb_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal
> intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support
> irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel
> aesni_intel crypto_simd mei_me cryptd glue_helper ipmi_si sg mei
> lpc_ich pcspkr joydev ioatdma i2c_i801 ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler
> wmi ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sd_mod mgag200 drm_vram_helper ttm
> drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm isci
> libsas ahci scsi_transport_sas libahci crc32c_intel serio_raw igb
> libata ptp pps_core dca i2c_algo_bit dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log
> dm_mod [last unloaded: nitrox_drv]
> [  270.896836] CPU: 1 PID: 7387 Comm: uperf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G
>         OE     5.3.0-rc4 #1
> [  270.897711] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-1027R-N3RF/X9DRW, BIOS
> 3.0c 03/24/2014
> [  270.898597] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x62/0x90
> [  270.899478] Code: 00 00 00 c3 48 89 fe 48 89 c2 48 c7 c7 e0 f9 ee
> 8d e8 b2 cf c8 ff 0f 0b 31 c0 c3 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 18 fa ee 8d e8 9e
> cf c8 ff <0f> 0b 31 c0 c3 48 89 f2 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 50 fa ee 8d e8 87
> cf c8
> [  270.901321] RSP: 0018:ffffb6ea86eb7c20 EFLAGS: 00010282
> [  270.902240] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff91cc3753c000 RCX: 
> 0000000000000000
> [  270.903157] RDX: ffff91bc3f867080 RSI: ffff91bc3f857738 RDI: 
> ffff91bc3f857738
> [  270.904074] RBP: ffff91bc36020940 R08: 0000000000000560 R09: 
> 0000000000000000
> [  270.904988] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 
> 0000000000000000
> [  270.905902] R13: ffff91cc3753a800 R14: ffff91cc37cc6400 R15: 
> ffff91cc3753a800
> [  270.906809] FS:  00007f454a88d700(0000) GS:ffff91bc3f840000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [  270.907715] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [  270.908606] CR2: 00007f453c00292c CR3: 000000103554e003 CR4: 
> 00000000001606e0
> [  270.909490] Call Trace:
> [  270.910373]  tls_tx_records+0x138/0x1c0 [tls]
> [  270.911262]  tls_sw_sendpage+0x3e0/0x420 [tls]
> [  270.912154]  inet_sendpage+0x52/0x90
> [  270.913045]  ? direct_splice_actor+0x40/0x40
> [  270.913941]  kernel_sendpage+0x1a/0x30
> [  270.914831]  sock_sendpage+0x20/0x30
> [  270.915714]  pipe_to_sendpage+0x62/0x90
> [  270.916592]  __splice_from_pipe+0x80/0x180
> [  270.917461]  ? direct_splice_actor+0x40/0x40
> [  270.918334]  splice_from_pipe+0x5d/0x90
> [  270.919208]  direct_splice_actor+0x35/0x40
> [  270.920086]  splice_direct_to_actor+0x103/0x230
> [  270.920966]  ? generic_pipe_buf_nosteal+0x10/0x10
> [  270.921850]  do_splice_direct+0x9a/0xd0
> [  270.922733]  do_sendfile+0x1c9/0x3d0
> [  270.923612]  __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x5c/0xc0
>
> Signed-off-by: Pooja Trivedi <pooja.triv...@stackpath.com>
> ---
>  include/net/tls.h | 1 +
>  net/tls/tls_sw.c  | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tls.h b/include/net/tls.h
> index 41b2d41..f346a54 100644
> --- a/include/net/tls.h
> +++ b/include/net/tls.h
> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct tls_sw_context_tx {
>
>  #define BIT_TX_SCHEDULED       0
>  #define BIT_TX_CLOSING         1
> +#define BIT_TX_IN_PROGRESS     2
>         unsigned long tx_bitmask;
>  };
>
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> index 91d21b0..6e99c61 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> @@ -367,6 +367,10 @@ int tls_tx_records(struct sock *sk, int flags)
>         struct sk_msg *msg_en;
>         int tx_flags, rc = 0;
>
> +       /* If another writer is already in tls_tx_records, backoff and leave 
> */
> +       if (test_and_set_bit(BIT_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &ctx->tx_bitmask))
> +               return 0;
> +
>         if (tls_is_partially_sent_record(tls_ctx)) {
>                 rec = list_first_entry(&ctx->tx_list,
>                                        struct tls_rec, list);
> @@ -415,6 +419,9 @@ int tls_tx_records(struct sock *sk, int flags)
>         if (rc < 0 && rc != -EAGAIN)
>                 tls_err_abort(sk, EBADMSG);
>
> +       /* clear the bit so another writer can get into tls_tx_records */
> +       clear_bit(BIT_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &ctx->tx_bitmask);
> +
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

Reply via email to