On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 11:45 AM Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 7:23 PM Thomas Higdon <t...@fb.com> wrote:
> >
> > Neal Cardwell mentioned that snd_wnd would be useful for diagnosing TCP
> > performance problems --
> > > (1) Usually when we're diagnosing TCP performance problems, we do so
> > > from the sender, since the sender makes most of the
> > > performance-critical decisions (cwnd, pacing, TSO size, TSQ, etc).
> > > From the sender-side the thing that would be most useful is to see
> > > tp->snd_wnd, the receive window that the receiver has advertised to
> > > the sender.
> >
> > This serves the purpose of adding an additional __u32 to avoid the
> > would-be hole caused by the addition of the tcpi_rcvi_ooopack field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Higdon <t...@fb.com>
> > ---
> > changes since v4:
> >  - clarify comment
>
> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>

Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soh...@google.com>

Thank you for adding the new field!

Reply via email to