[patch net-next 04/15] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Don't rely on missing extack to symbolize dump

[Jiri Pirko]

From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>

Currently if info->extack is NULL, mlxsw assumes that the event came
down from dump. Originally, the dump did not propagate the return value
back to the original caller (fib_notifier_register()). However, that is
now happening. So benefit from this and push the error up if it happened.
Remove rule cases in work handlers that are now dead code.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
---
 .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 22 +------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index 6d78d2002335..43dbe25674f7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -6019,12 +6019,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_event_work(struct 
work_struct *work)
                mlxsw_sp_router_fib4_del(mlxsw_sp, &fib_work->fen_info);
                fib_info_put(fib_work->fen_info.fi);
                break;
-       case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-               /* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-                * just do the fib_abort
-                */
-               mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-               break;
        case FIB_EVENT_NH_ADD: /* fall through */
        case FIB_EVENT_NH_DEL:
                mlxsw_sp_nexthop4_event(mlxsw_sp, fib_work->event,
@@ -6065,12 +6059,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_work(struct 
work_struct *work)
                                         fib_work->fib6_work.nrt6);
                mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_work_fini(&fib_work->fib6_work);
                break;
-       case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-               /* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-                * just do the fib_abort
-                */
-               mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-               break;
        }
        rtnl_unlock();
        kfree(fib_work);
@@ -6112,12 +6100,6 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_router_fibmr_event_work(struct 
work_struct *work)
                                              &fib_work->ven_info);
                dev_put(fib_work->ven_info.dev);
                break;
-       case FIB_EVENT_RULE_ADD:
-               /* if we get here, a rule was added that we do not support.
-                * just do the fib_abort
-                */
-               mlxsw_sp_router_fib_abort(mlxsw_sp);
-               break;
        }
        rtnl_unlock();
        kfree(fib_work);
@@ -6262,9 +6244,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event(struct 
notifier_block *nb,
        case FIB_EVENT_RULE_DEL:
                err = mlxsw_sp_router_fib_rule_event(event, info,
                                                     router->mlxsw_sp);
-               if (!err || info->extack)
-                       return notifier_from_errno(err);
-               break;
+               return notifier_from_errno(err);
        case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_ADD:
        case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_REPLACE: /* fall through */
        case FIB_EVENT_ENTRY_APPEND:  /* fall through */
-- 
2.21.0