On 9/13/19 10:14 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > it came out that cumulus and a few others were possibly using high > values of 127.x for switch chassis addressing, but we haven't got any > documentation on how that works yet.
Not Cumulus. I noted I am aware of 2 products from my history that use 127.x addresses for communications within a box - e.g., to a bmc - that your patch could break. Really it was meant as a data point that there are released products that would be affected.
