From: Li RongQing <lirongq...@baidu.com>
when spinlock is locked/unlocked, its elements will be changed,
so marking it as __read_mostly is not suitable.
and remove a duplicate definition of nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock
strange that compiler does not complain.
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongq...@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 3 +--
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 81a8ef42b88d..0c63120b2db2 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -73,8 +73,7 @@ struct conntrack_gc_work {
};
static __read_mostly struct kmem_cache *nf_conntrack_cachep;
-static __read_mostly spinlock_t nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock;
-static __read_mostly DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
static __read_mostly bool nf_conntrack_locks_all;
/* every gc cycle scans at most 1/GC_MAX_BUCKETS_DIV part of table */
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c
b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c
index d1c6b2a2e7bd..522792556632 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.h>
#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.h>
-static __read_mostly DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_connlabels_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_connlabels_lock);
static int replace_u32(u32 *address, u32 mask, u32 new)
{
--
2.11.0
