Hi Vladimir, On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:49:30AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > I did something similar in v1 with a .port_setup_taprio in "[RFC PATCH > net-next 3/6] net: dsa: Pass tc-taprio offload to drivers".
Okay, didn't see that one. > Would this address Ilias's comment about DSA not really needing to > have this level of awareness into the qdisc offload type? Rightfully I > can agree that the added-value of making a .port_set_schedule and > .port_del_schedule in DSA compared to simply passing the ndo_setup_tc > is not that great. I wanted to avoid that drivers have to the same kind of work, and it put it therefore into the core part. However, I agree that the added-value is not that high for TAPRIO. > > By the way, thanks for the iproute2 patch for parsing 64-bit base time > on ARM 32, saved me a bit of debugging time :) No problem :). That cost me a bit of time. > Regards, > -Vladimir Thanks, Kurt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
