Add two tests to check that stack slot marking during backtracking doesn't trigger 'spi > allocated_stack' warning. One test is using BPF_ST insn. Another is using BPF_STX.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org> --- these tests depend on the fix https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1157368/ --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c index a455a4a71f11..02151f8c940f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c @@ -140,3 +140,55 @@ .errstr = "!read_ok", .result = REJECT, }, +{ + "precise: ST insn causing spi > allocated_stack", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, 123, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, -8, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ, + .errstr = "5: (2d) if r4 > r0 goto pc+0\ + last_idx 5 first_idx 5\ + parent didn't have regs=10 stack=0 marks\ + last_idx 4 first_idx 2\ + regs=10 stack=0 before 4\ + regs=10 stack=0 before 3\ + regs=0 stack=1 before 2\ + last_idx 5 first_idx 5\ + parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks", + .result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT, + .retval = -1, +}, +{ + "precise: STX insn causing spi > allocated_stack", + .insns = { + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, 123, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, -8), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ, + .errstr = "last_idx 6 first_idx 6\ + parent didn't have regs=10 stack=0 marks\ + last_idx 5 first_idx 3\ + regs=10 stack=0 before 5\ + regs=10 stack=0 before 4\ + regs=0 stack=1 before 3\ + last_idx 6 first_idx 6\ + parent didn't have regs=1 stack=0 marks\ + last_idx 5 first_idx 3\ + regs=1 stack=0 before 5", + .result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT, + .retval = -1, +}, -- 2.20.0
