From: Vladimir Oltean <olte...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 15:46:19 +0300
> When a function such as dsa_slave_create fails, currently the following
> stack trace can be seen:
...
> devlink_free is complaining right here:
>
> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink->port_list));
>
> This happens because devlink_port_unregister is no longer done right
> away in dsa_port_setup when a DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER has failed.
> Vivien said about this change that:
>
> Also no need to call devlink_port_unregister from within dsa_port_setup
> as this step is inconditionally handled by dsa_port_teardown on error.
>
> which is not really true. The devlink_port_unregister function _is_
> being called unconditionally from within dsa_port_setup, but not for
> this port that just failed, just for the previous ones which were set
> up.
>
> ports_teardown:
> for (i = 0; i < port; i++)
> dsa_port_teardown(&ds->ports[i]);
>
> Initially I was tempted to fix this by extending the "for" loop to also
> cover the port that failed during setup. But this could have potentially
> unforeseen consequences unrelated to devlink_port or even other types of
> ports than user ports, which I can't really test for. For example, if
> for some reason devlink_port_register itself would fail, then
> unconditionally unregistering it in dsa_port_teardown would not be a
> smart idea. The list might go on.
>
> So just make dsa_port_setup undo the setup it had done upon failure, and
> let the for loop undo the work of setting up the previous ports, which
> are guaranteed to be brought up to a consistent state.
>
> Fixes: 955222ca5281 ("net: dsa: use a single switch statement for port setup")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olte...@gmail.com>
Applied to net-next, thanks.
